The role of in-house legal is changing. You’re no longer expected to simply review risk after decisions are made – you now exist to shape commercial strategy, enable faster deals and provide clearer insight across the business.
But stepping into that role needs the right structures, processes and ways of working. Not sure where to get started? Take a look at five strategies high-performing legal teams are adopting and implementing to be more effective in 2026.
Many legal teams have already experimented with AI, but not many have become truly AI literate and integrated AI throughout their tasks and strategic thinking. Our Legal Disruptors report shows that 89% of in-house legal professionals say they use some form of AI tool, but only 42% use multiple tools consistently.
In other words, adoption is widespread, but confidence and consistency lags, which is why literacy matters. Lily Schurra, Senior Commercial Counsel and one of our Legal Disruptors says that the real value of AI isn’t about automation for its own sake, but it’s how AI augments human reasoning and judgment. To her, tools should support thinking and problem solving, and should be shaped by clear processes, rather than the other way round.
Legal teams have always delivered value, but historically that value has been difficult to quantify. That’s changing.
As legal teams take on a more strategic role, data is essential to how you show your impact and guide decisions. Research from Deloitte says that high-performing legal functions are significantly more likely to use defined KPIs to manage workload, risk and value delivery – in other words, the teams that’ll gain the most influence are the ones that can translate legal activity into measurable outcomes.
Metrics to track as an effective legal team could include:
Even simple data points can demonstrate legal’s contribution beyond risk mitigation, and they strengthen conversations around headcount, budget, technology investment and process change. Effective in-house teams are shifting from cost center to strategic operator by quantifying their impact.
Most teams already know they should spend more time on strategic work, but the challenge is that day-to-day demands – contract reviews, approvals and compliance checks – don’t often make a lot of space for it.
Thomson Reuters highlighted that 79% of legal teams report increasing contract volumes, but only a third see corresponding headcount growth.
But teams that successfully shift away from routine work unlock something more powerful than efficiency: influence. When your team has more capacity, you’re able to take part in commercial decisions, shape decision structures, guide risk conversations and help leadership move faster. In other words, you stop being the team that reviews decisions, and become part of the team that helps shape them.
Effective in-house legal teams don’t operate as a reactive service function - they position themselves as commercial partners. That starts with alignment, understanding business priorities, anticipating pressure points and building transparency so legal is viewed as an enabler.
Research from Thomson Reuters shows that advising the business effectively is a top function of corporate lawyers, and the same report found that 72% of legal departments focus on operational efficiency as a key priority.
{{quote 1}}
Technology is often presented as the answer to legal’s efficiency and influence challenges, but in reality, it only delivers actual value when it supports well-designed processes. Cisco’s Data Privacy Benchmark Study found that more than 90% of organizations believe generative AI requires new approaches to managing data and risk. Successful legal teams treat technology as a workflow accelerator, a consistency enabler, a visibility tool and a risk-monitoring mechanism.
So what should you focus on when looking at technology to support your day-to-day work?
It’s best to see technology as a means to an end – the end being a legal team that delivers faster, smarter and more strategically, without compromising risk oversight.
In 2026 and beyond, effective in-house legal teams won’t be defined by how busy they are, but how they design their work, and how intentionally they do that.
For many organizations, contracting could be the clearest test of that design, because it’s where volume, revenue impact and risk intersect. Teams that drive structure, visibility and data to that process create capacity for strategic work, but relying on inboxes and manual tracking means you could get left behind.
In short: effectiveness isn’t about doing more, but about building systems that allow legal to operate with clarity, consistency and commercial alignment.
To explore how in-house legal leaders are transforming their legal operations and contracting processes, take a look at our Legal Disruptors report for deeper insights, practical frameworks and real-world examples of effective in-house teams in action.
“Legal effectiveness today is less about individual effort and more about operational design. Teams that standardize routine work and create visibility across contracting are giving themselves the capacity to influence commercial outcomes earlier and more consistently.”
